State records show The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center notified the Maryland Attorney General of a data breach on March 12, 2025. Affected individuals receive a formal notification letter by mail. That letter is proof your information was exposed — and the starting point for a free claim review.
The Maryland Attorney General filing confirms the breach notice — not a court case. Dollar amounts and deadlines are shown only when a verifiable court filing supports them — nothing on this page estimates or guarantees a result.
Records filed with the Maryland AG show that The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center confirmed exposure of the information below:
The more sensitive the data involved, the stronger the potential claim. Disclosure of these categories is legally recognized harm.
The Seltzer Firm and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center represent a complex intersection of elite legal advocacy and world-renowned oncology care. MD Anderson Cancer Center is globally recognized as a premier academic medical institution dedicated to patient care, research, education, and prevention, meaning it handles vast volumes of highly sensitive protected health information (PHI) alongside detailed patient financial records. Concurrently, specialized legal entities like The Seltzer Firm manage confidential client files, corporate compliance data, proprietary research, and sensitive settlement or litigation records. Because of the critical, high-stakes nature of their operations, these organizations routinely collect, process, and store immense quantities of sensitive personal, medical, and financial data for patients, employees, and clients alike, making them prime targets for malicious cyber actors seeking high-value information.
In 2025, a significant security incident involving The Seltzer Firm and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center was formally reported to the Maryland Attorney General's office. While the precise vectors of such sophisticated attacks vary, incidents targeting premier healthcare and legal entities typically involve unauthorized network intrusions, targeted ransomware deployment, or severe third-party vendor compromises. Because healthcare networks and legal databases house interconnected systems containing legacy data alongside modern electronic health record (EHR) platforms, attackers frequently exploit vulnerabilities in perimeter defenses or credential management protocols to gain persistent access to internal environments before exfiltrating critical databases.
The exposure resulting from this breach compromises a devastating array of sensitive data categories, each carrying severe, long-term risks for affected individuals. Exposed protected health information, such as medical record numbers, diagnoses, treatment histories, and health insurance details, can be exploited by bad actors to commit medical fraud, fraudulently obtain prescription drugs, or disrupt ongoing patient care. Furthermore, if Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details, or legal document files were accessed, victims face an immediate and elevated risk of identity theft, tax fraud, unauthorized credit openings, and complete financial account takeover. The unauthorized disclosure of such intimate personal details fundamentally shatters an individual's privacy and leaves them vulnerable to targeted phishing scams and social engineering attacks for years to come.
Organizations handling healthcare and confidential professional data are bound by stringent regulatory frameworks, most notably the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), alongside state data protection statutes and common-law duties of care. These legal frameworks mandate rigorous administrative, physical, and technical safeguards—such as robust encryption standards, multi-factor authentication, continuous network monitoring, and routine vulnerability assessments—to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive files. The occurrence of a widespread data breach strongly suggests a failure in these mandatory security protocols, indicating that the organization may have fallen short of its legal obligations to properly secure and defend its network infrastructure against foreseeable cyber threats.
Receiving an official data breach notification letter from The Seltzer Firm or The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center serves as formal legal confirmation that your private information was compromised due to inadequate corporate security measures. Under established legal principles, this notification establishes the necessary standing to initiate or participate in a class action lawsuit aimed at demanding accountability, securing financial compensation, and forcing organizational improvements in data protection practices. Importantly, affected individuals do not need to prove that they have already suffered direct financial loss or identity theft to pursue legal action; the mere exposure of private data constitutes a compensable injury. Our law firm handles these complex privacy cases on a strict contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing out of pocket, and we only collect a fee if we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Many people wrongly assume a claim requires proven fraud. The law recognizes data exposure alone as harm. See which of these describes your situation:
You received a data breach notification letter from The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
You were a customer, patient, employee, or client of The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Your personal information was stored in The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's systems
Your Social Security number or driver's license number was exposed
Your medical records, diagnoses, or health insurance information was compromised
Your financial account, credit card, or banking information was disclosed
You reside in the United States (all 50 states eligible)
That letter is legally required and confirms your data was exposed. It also gives you standing to file a claim.
What your notification letter means & what to do next →Four moves to make now — they protect both your identity and your legal position:
Do not discard the The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center letter. It documents your standing as an affected individual — the foundation of any claim you file.
Look for the credit-monitoring offer section of your The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center letter and enroll. It is free, and it creates a paper trail of any resulting fraud.
Place security freezes at all three bureaus — Equifax, Experian, TransUnion. New-account fraud dies at the freeze; you can unfreeze temporarily for legitimate applications.
Deadlines apply to breach claims. A free review of your The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center letter takes minutes, and we only get paid if you do.
Security Incident
Prior to AG notification
Someone gained unauthorized access to data held in The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's systems.
Reported to Attorney General
March 12, 2025
The Maryland AG received The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center's formal data breach disclosure.
Consumer Notification Letters Sent
Within weeks of AG filing
Affected individuals receive mailed notification letters as required by statute.
Legal Window — Act Now
Statute of limitations applies
Legal deadlines limit how long you have to act on this breach.
Several forms of recovery may be available to The Seltzer Firm; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center letter recipients — the exact mix depends on state law and the data types exposed:
States like Maryland may allow statutory damages per incident regardless of actual harm — California sets $100–$750 as the benchmark.
Covers fraud charges, unauthorized account activity, and expenses traced directly to the breach.
Time spent handling breach fallout — freezes, disputes, monitoring — is compensable.
If you paid for credit monitoring or identity protection after the breach, those costs can be recovered.
SSN and driver's license exposure creates long-term identity theft risk. Courts recognize the ongoing value of this harm and may award damages accordingly.
The unauthorized exposure of health and medical information may trigger HIPAA-related claims and additional state health privacy protections.
Exposure of financial account or credit/debit card information entitles victims to recover for actual and potential fraud losses.
Maryland's Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) requires companies to implement reasonable security measures. Violations can support statutory damages claims even without proof of financial harm.
The companies below also filed breach notices with the Maryland Attorney General. Letter recipients for any of them can pursue a review.
Lyon Management Group, Inc.
Maryland · Jan 2025
Cabrillo College
Maryland · Feb 2025
Christopher L. Mewborn, Attorney, P.A. d/b/a Mewborn & DeSelms, Attorneys at Law
Maryland · Feb 2025
Ott Cone & Redpath, P.A.
Maryland · Jan 2025
ChurchShield
Maryland · Jan 2025
lannuzzi Manetta & Company P.C.; lannuzzi & Darling
Maryland · Jan 2025
Contact us for a FREE consultation. No fee unless we win your case.
(786) 306-7278Free Claim ReviewLaw Office of David S. Harris